ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.01958· 20 results

cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 28, 2026

Rethinking Literature Search Evaluation: Deep Research Helps, and Human Citation Lists Are Not a Ground Truth

Gaurav Sahu, Laurent Charlin, Christopher Pal

The paper introduces a Deep Research pipeline that significantly improves literature search recall and demonstrates that human-curated citation lists are often unreliable and do not serve as a true gr…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

DeepSurvey: Enhancing Analytical Depth and Citation Reliability in Automated Survey Generation

Ziyue Yang, Da Ma, Hanqi Li, Zijian Wang +7 more

DeepSurvey is an agentic system that significantly enhances automated survey generation by extracting deep, structured knowledge from full-text papers and rigorously validating citations, achieving su…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

AI for Monitoring and Classifying Data Used in Research Literature

Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio

The paper introduces a novel, scalable framework to monitor and classify dataset usage within research literature, addressing the current lack of infrastructure for tracking data citations.

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Not What, But How: A Communicative Audit of LLM Response Framing

Siddhesh Milind Pawar, Sarah Masud, Haneul Yoo, Alice Oh +1 more

The paper introduces FRANZ, a communicative audit framework, to evaluate how LLMs frame responses to subjective questions, finding that LLMs exhibit statistically significant and coupled differences i…

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 9, 2026

BiAxisAudit: A Novel Framework to Evaluate LLM Bias Across Prompt Sensitivity and Response-Layer Divergence

Jialing Gan, Junhao Dong, Songze Li

The paper introduces BiAxisAudit, a novel framework that evaluates LLM bias by analyzing bias scores across multiple prompt formats and within the internal inconsistency of model responses, revealing…

View →
cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCRecentMay 27, 2026

When Models Disagree: Rethinking LLM Evaluation for Public Comment Analysis

Aisha Najera, Alvin Moon, Vedant Srinivasan, Rajesh Veeraraghavan

The paper proposes an Interpretive Audit Pipeline to evaluate LLMs for public comment analysis, arguing that measuring inter-model disagreement is crucial because standard accuracy metrics fail to det…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

ForeSci: Evaluating LLM Agents for Forward-Looking AI Research Judgment

Qiuyu Tian, Zequn Liu, Yingce Xia, Haojie Yin +1 more

The paper introduces ForeSci, a novel benchmark that evaluates LLM agents' ability to make forward-looking research judgments using only historical evidence, finding that explicit evidence organizatio…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 27, 2026

Whose Name Comes Up? III: Persona Prompting Effects in LLM-Based Scholar Recommendation

Annabella Sánchez-Guzmán, Lukas Eberhard, Denis Helic, Lisette Espín-Noboa

The paper proposes a comprehensive benchmark to systematically audit how varying persona prompts and model choices affect the technical quality and social representativeness of scholar recommendations…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

VET: A Framework for Analyzing AI Discourse

Meredith Ringel Morris

The paper introduces the VET Framework, a tool for analyzing polarized public discourse on AI by categorizing narratives based on valence, effectiveness, and trajectory, thereby promoting AI literacy.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

ResearchLoop: An Evidence-Gated Control Plane for AI-Assisted Research

Yihan Xia, Taotao Wang

ResearchLoop introduces an evidence-gated control plane to manage and audit the state of AI-assisted computational research, mitigating the risk of unverified claims.

View →
cs.CYcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

How Early Adopters Used Generative AI Worldwide: Variation by Country Income and Language

Madeleine I. G. Daepp, Isaac Slaughter

This study analyzes global usage patterns of generative AI among early adopters, finding that usage varies significantly by country income, with schooling being the primary use in low-income countries…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Reading Between the Citations: A Typed Claim Network for Scientific Literature

Ning Ding, Sergio J. Rodríguez Méndez, Pouya G. Omran

The paper introduces a typed claim network that models cross-document references by explicitly labeling the stance (e.g., agreement, disagreement) of a citation, significantly improving downstream tas…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

RealityTest: How People Probe AI Identity and Whether Models Disclose It

Anna Gausen, Sarenne Wallbridge, Bessie O'Dell, Christopher Summerfield +1 more

RealityTest introduces a large-scale, multimodal, and multilingual benchmark using real-world human data to test how AI systems disclose their identity, finding that context and phrasing are more crit…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Fighting Numerical Hallucinations via Data-centric Compilation for Online Financial QA

Hao Chen, Xing Tang, Qirui Liu, Weijie Shi +5 more

The paper introduces the Data-centric Reasoning Compiler (DCRC), a novel data-driven framework that enhances financial QA systems by compiling user queries and retrieved documents into verifiable, exe…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

SciIntBench: Measuring LLM Compliance with Research Integrity Norms Under Adversarial Framing

Almene De Meran Meguimtsop, Maria Leonor Pacheco, Daniel E. Acuna

The paper introduces SciIntBench, an adversarial benchmark that reveals that LLMs' adherence to research integrity norms is highly sensitive to how the misconduct is framed, often failing when the mis…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

SciIntBench: Measuring LLM Compliance with Research Integrity Norms Under Adversarial Framing

Almene De Meran Meguimtsop, Maria Leonor Pacheco, Daniel E. Acuna

The paper introduces SciIntBench, an adversarial benchmark that reveals that LLMs' adherence to research integrity norms is highly sensitive to how the misconduct is framed, failing particularly when…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

BlueFin: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Financial Spreadsheets

Srivatsa Kundurthy, Clara Na, Colton Moraine, Anoushka Mohta +5 more

The paper introduces BlueFin, a challenging benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on complex financial spreadsheet tasks, finding that even frontier models perform poorly, scoring less than 50% on avera…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

When Does Persona Prompting Actually Help? A Retrieval and Metric Analysis of Expert Role Injection in LLMs

Shuai Xiao, Su Liu, Weikai Zhou, Jialun Wu +3 more

Persona prompting does not universally improve LLM performance; instead, it systematically trades increased expertise depth for reduced clarity, making multi-metric evaluation essential.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Evaluating the Realism of LLM-powered Social Agents: A Case Study of Reactions to Spanish Online News

Alejandro Buitrago López, Alberto Ortega Pastor, Javier Pastor-Galindo, José A. Ruipérez-Valiente

The paper evaluates LLM-generated reactions to Spanish online news, finding that off-the-shelf models fail to accurately reproduce the measurable properties of real audience discourse, and even fine-t…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 27, 2026

Show, Don't TELL: Explainable AI-Generated Text Detection

Aldan Creo, Suraj Ranganath

The paper introduces TELL, a novel explainable AI-generated text detection architecture that provides detailed, human-understandable explanations for its scores, achieving competitive performance whil…

View →