ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.23117v2· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 12, 2026

CoT-Guard: Small Models for Strong Monitoring

Nirav Diwan, Han Wang, Berkcan Kapusuzoglu, Ramin Moradi +5 more

The paper introduces CoT-Guard, a small, cost-effective 4B-parameter model that significantly outperforms large, expensive monitors like GPT-5 in detecting hidden objectives in code generation tasks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 8, 2026

WebTrap: Stealthy Mid-Task Hijacking of Browser Agents During Navigation

Zhichao Liu, Wenbo Pan, Haining Yu, Ge Gao +2 more

WebTrap introduces a stealthy, mid-task hijacking attack that successfully compromises browser agents during long-horizon tasks by seamlessly fusing malicious instructions with the original user goal.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.RORecentMay 27, 2026

ReasonBreak: Probing Vulnerabilities in Reasoning-Enabled Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving

Mohammadreza Teymoorianfard, Jean-Philippe Monteuuis, Jonathan Petit, Amir Houmansadr

This paper demonstrates that reasoning-enabled Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving are highly vulnerable to realistic input perturbations, significantly compromising both reason…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 10, 2026

Unreal Thinking: Chain-of-Thought Hijacking via Two-stage Backdoor

Wenhan Chang, Tianqing Zhu, Ping Xiong, Faqian Guan +1 more

The paper proposes Two-stage Backdoor Hijacking (TSBH) to create persistent, trigger-activated malicious behaviors by manipulating the observable Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process in Large Language Model…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

MirageBackdoor: A Stealthy Attack that Induces Think-Well-Answer-Wrong Reasoning

Yizhe Zeng, Wei Zhang, Yunpeng Li, Juxin Xiao +2 more

MirageBackdoor introduces a novel, highly stealthy backdoor attack that forces Large Language Models to generate correct reasoning steps (Think Well) but output an incorrect final answer (Answer Wrong…

View →
cs.ROcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Propagating Unsafe Actions in LLM Controlled Multi-Robot Collaboration via Single Robot Compromise

Zhen Huang, Zhihuang Liu, Mengxuan Luo, Weishang Wu +1 more

The paper proposes a novel attack paradigm demonstrating how compromising a single robot in an LLM-controlled multi-robot system can rapidly propagate malicious intent to cause coordinated unsafe acti…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Provably Secure Agent Guardrail

Benlong Wu, Weiming Zhang, Kejiang Chen, Han Fang +1 more

The paper introduces an executable Proof-Constrained Action (ePCA) framework that secures AI agents by forcing them to formalize their intentions into first-order logical constraints, achieving provab…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Provably Secure Agent Guardrail

Benlong Wu, Weiming Zhang, Kejiang Chen, Han Fang +1 more

The paper introduces a formal, logically constrained framework, ePCA, to secure advanced AI agents by forcing them to translate natural language intentions into first-order logical constraints before…

View →
cs.ROcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

Continuous Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action

Yueh-Hua Wu, Tatsuya Matsushima, Kei Ota

The paper proposes Continuous Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, arguing that effective reasoning must be a shared, verifiable internal latent space rather than discrete text tokens, l…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 21, 2026

Benchmarking Autonomous Agents against Temporal, Spatial, and Semantic Evasions

Jianan Ma, Xiaohu Du, Ruixiao Lin, Yaoxiang Bian +7 more

The paper introduces a multi-dimensional evasion framework and a new benchmark (A3S-Bench) to test autonomous agents, demonstrating that stateful, multi-turn attacks significantly increase system risk…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 12, 2026

Critical-CoT: A Robust Defense Framework against Reasoning-Level Backdoor Attacks in Large Language Models

Vu Tuan Truong, Long Bao Le

The paper introduces Critical-CoT, a novel two-stage fine-tuning defense framework that equips LLMs with critical thinking abilities to detect and reject malicious reasoning steps introduced by advanc…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

VisualThink-VLA: Visual Intermediate Reasoning for Effective and Low-Latency Vision-Language-Action Policies

Mingjian Gao, Wenqiao Zhang, Yuqian Yuan, Yang Dai +8 more

VISUALTHINK-VLA introduces a visual intermediate-reasoning framework that guides action prediction using compact visual evidence, achieving high accuracy and significantly low latency for real-time Vi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

LoopTrap: Termination Poisoning Attacks on LLM Agents

Huiyu Xu, Zhibo Wang, Wenhui Zhang, Ziqi Zhu +3 more

The paper introduces LoopTrap, an automated red-teaming framework that demonstrates how malicious prompts can poison the termination judgment of LLM agents, causing unbounded computation.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 28, 2026

R-CoT: A Reasoning-Layer Watermark via Redundant Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models

Ziming Zhang, Li Li, Guorui Feng, Hanzhou Wu +1 more

The paper proposes R-CoT, a reasoning-layer watermarking framework that embeds ownership watermarks directly into the stable reasoning path of LLMs, achieving high robustness against perturbations.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 6, 2026

Mapping the Exploitation Surface: A 10,000-Trial Taxonomy of What Makes LLM Agents Exploit Vulnerabilities

Charafeddine Mouzouni

The paper systematically maps LLM agent vulnerabilities by testing 10,000 prompt variations, finding that 'goal reframing' language is the primary trigger for exploitation, rather than broad adversari…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

Membership Inference Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models

Yuefeng Peng, Mingzhe Li, Kejing Xia, Renhao Zhang +1 more

This paper presents the first systematic study of membership inference attacks (MIAs) against Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, demonstrating that these models are highly vulnerable to privacy brea…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 6, 2026

Strengthening Human-Centric Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Integrity in LLMs via a Structured Prompt Framework

Jiling Zhou, Aisvarya Adeseye, Seppo Virtanen, Antti Hakkala +1 more

The paper proposes a structured prompt engineering framework to enhance the integrity and reliability of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in LLMs, demonstrating significant improvements in security-se…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.RORecentApr 29, 2026

From Prompt to Physical Actuation: Holistic Threat Modeling of LLM-Enabled Robotic Systems

Neha Nagaraja, Hayretdin Bahsi, Carlo R. da Cunha

The paper provides a holistic threat model for LLM-enabled robotic systems by analyzing how conventional, adversarial, and conversational threats propagate across the entire perception-planning-actuat…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 19, 2026

The Autonomy Tax: Defense Training Breaks LLM Agents

Shawn Li, Yue Zhao

Defense training for LLM agents, intended to improve safety, systematically degrades their core competence, leading to unreliability in multi-step tasks.

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

SpatialAct: Probing Spatial Reasoning-to-Action Capabilities of VLM Agents in 3D Scenes

Tianhui Liu, Jie Feng, Zhiheng Zheng, Shengyuan Wang +5 more

The paper introduces SpatialAct, a challenging benchmark that reveals a significant 'reasoning-to-action gap,' showing that current VLMs struggle to maintain coherent spatial understanding and perform…

View →