ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.02562· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMay 12, 2026

Safety Context Injection: Inference-Time Safety Alignment via Static Filtering and Agentic Analysis

Zhenhao Xu, Wenhan Chang, Yichuan Chen, Yuxin Fang +2 more

The paper proposes Safety Context Injection (SCI), an inference-time framework that prepends a structured external risk report to protect Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) against sophisticated jailbreaks…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CVRecentMar 28, 2026

Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses

Xiao Li, Xiang Zheng, Yifeng Gao, Xinyu Xia +34 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, structured review of safety research in Embodied AI, analyzing attacks and defenses across the entire embodied pipeline to guide the development of safe, robust,…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 1, 2026

Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models

Manoj Parmar

This paper surveys the risks associated with world models, proposing a unified threat model and demonstrating adversarial attacks that show world models require rigorous safety standards comparable to…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGcs.LORecentMay 29, 2026

Robust Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning

Edwin Hamel-De le Court, Thom Badings, Alessandro Abate, Francesco Belardinelli +1 more

The paper introduces a novel shielding framework for Robust MDPs (RMDPs) that guarantees safety under worst-case transition probabilities, enabling safe reinforcement learning even when transition dyn…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

EMBGuard: Constructing Hazard-Aware Guardrails for Safe Planning in Embodied Agents

Dongwook Choi, Taeyoon Kwon, Bogyung Jeong, Minju Kim +5 more

EMBGuard introduces a novel, MLLM-based safety guardrail that explicitly identifies and explains physical hazards from (visual observation, action) pairs, enabling safer planning for embodied agents.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models

Xunguang Wang, Yuguang Zhou, Qingyue Wang, Zongjie Li +4 more

This paper introduces a novel framework, the Reasoning Safety Monitor, to detect and prevent logical inconsistencies and adversarial manipulations within the internal reasoning steps of large language…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 16, 2026

Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility

Yining Hong, Yining She, Eunsuk Kang, Christopher S. Timperley +1 more

The paper proposes and evaluates symbolic guardrails as a practical method to provide strong, verifiable safety and security guarantees for domain-specific AI agents without compromising their utility…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

RUBAS: Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning for Agent Safety

Xian Qi Loye, Qinglin Su, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui +4 more

The paper introduces RUBAS, a rubric-based reinforcement learning framework that improves agent safety by providing fine-grained, multi-dimensional rewards for complex tool-use scenarios.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 17, 2026

LPG: Balancing Efficiency and Policy Reasoning in Latent Policy Guardrails

Nanxi Li, Zhengyue Zhao, Chaowei Xiao

The paper introduces Latent Policy Guardrail (LPG), a novel framework that efficiently enforces dynamic safety policies for LLMs by compressing complex policy deliberation into a small set of latent t…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving state-of-the-art safety performance with massiv…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving high safety performance with massive improvemen…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security

Jinhu Qi, Muzhi Li, Jiahong Liu, Yuqin Shu +8 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, practical guide to ensuring the trustworthiness of complex, autonomous agentic AI systems by focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

ConsisGuard: Aligning Safety Deliberation with Policy Enforcement in LLM Guardrails

Yan Wang, Zhixuan Chu, Zihao Xue, Zhen Bi +8 more

The paper introduces ConsisGuard, a framework that addresses the 'deliberation-to-enforcement gap' in LLM guardrails by ensuring that the reasoning process is faithfully and consistently translated in…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

The Verifier Tax: Horizon Dependent Safety Success Tradeoffs in Tool Using LLM Agents

Tanmay Sah, Vishal Srivastava, Dolly Sah, Kayden Jordan

The paper analyzes how runtime safety enforcement impacts the performance of multi-step LLM agents, finding that while safety mechanisms can block unsafe actions, they impose a significant performance…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

AgentTrust is a novel runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates AI agent tool calls before execution, achieving high accuracy in detecting unsafe actions across complex and obfuscated scenari…

View →
cs.CVcs.CLcs.RORecentJun 1, 2026

RoboTrustBench: Benchmarking the Trustworthiness of Video World Models for Robotic Manipulation

Huiqiong Li, Jiayu Wang, Zhiting Mei, Anirudha Majumdar +2 more

The paper introduces RoboTrustBench, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates the trustworthiness of video world models for robotic manipulation across challenging scenarios, finding that current mode…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYRecentJun 1, 2026

SafeMCP: Proactive Power Regulation for LLM Agent Defense via Environment-Grounded Look-Ahead Reasoning

Lichao Wang, Zhaoxing Ren, Tianzhuo Yang, Jiaming Ji +3 more

SafeMCP is a server-side defense plugin that uses look-ahead reasoning to proactively filter and constrain tool acquisition for LLM agents, thereby mitigating catastrophic risks associated with expand…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

When Safety Geometry Collapses: Fine-Tuning Vulnerabilities in Agentic Guard Models

Ismail Hossain, Sai Puppala, Jannatul Ferdaus, Md Jahangir Alam +3 more

The paper demonstrates that fine-tuning safety guard models on benign data can catastrophically collapse their safety alignment, proposing Fisher-Weighted Safety Subspace Regularization (FW-SSR) to ac…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

SafeHarbor: Hierarchical Memory-Augmented Guardrail for LLM Agent Safety

Zhe Liu, Zonghao Ying, Wenxin Zhang, Quanchen Zou +4 more

SafeHarbor is a novel, hierarchical memory-augmented framework that establishes context-aware decision boundaries for LLM agents, achieving state-of-the-art safety while minimizing over-refusal.

View →
cs.CVcs.LGcs.RORecentJun 2, 2026

VLESA: Vision-Language Embodied Safety Agent for Human Activity Monitoring

Hanjiang Hu, Yiyuan Pan, Jiaxing Li, Xusheng Luo +4 more

VLESA is a novel framework that monitors human activities from egocentric video to predict and intervene in dangerous actions by incorporating goal-conditioned safety checks based on inferred intent.

View →