ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.03988· 20 results

cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Beyond Visual Memory: Mechanistic Diagnostics of Latent Visual Reasoning

Garvin Guo, Yu Chen, Xiang Wang, Shuai Li +3 more

The paper deconstructs latent visual reasoning tokens into components and finds that the performance gains are primarily due to boundary markers and attention patterns, not the tokens' ability to enco…

View →
cs.CVRecentJun 4, 2026

Thinking with Imagination: Agentic Visual Spatial Reasoning with World Simulators

Chenming Zhu, Jingli Lin, Yilin Long, Peizhou Cao +3 more

The paper proposes Astra, an agentic framework that equips Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with the ability to perform spatial reasoning by actively generating and utilizing imagined visual evidence fro…

View →
cs.CLcs.CVRecentJun 1, 2026

Mechanistic Diagnostics of Spatial Lexical Bias in Multimodal Large Language Model Spatial Reasoning

Chuang Ma, Qianying Liu, Tomoyuki Obuchi, Fei Cheng +5 more

The paper identifies a failure mode called spatial lexical bias in MLLMs, where adding a spatial word to options biases the model's choice, and demonstrates that this failure originates primarily from…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Do LLMs Build World Models From Text? A Multilingual Diagnostic of Spatial Reasoning

Zhikai Pan, Chih-Ting Liao, Chunrui Liu, Xi Xiao +4 more

The paper introduces a multilingual benchmark (MentalMap) to test if LLMs build internal spatial world models from text, finding a universal 'L3 reasoning cliff' suggesting that text-only working memo…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Seeing Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Know When Not to Answer Spatial Questions (and Why)?

Yue Zhang, Zun Wang, Han Lin, Yonatan Bitton +2 more

This paper introduces a new evaluation framework, SpatialUncertain, demonstrating that current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are prone to overconfident and incorrect answers to spatial questions when…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Look on Demand: A Cognitive Scheduling Framework for Visual Evidence Acquisition in Multimodal Reasoning

Yang Zhang, Xiaoshuai Sun, Rui Zhao, Wujin Sun +4 more

The paper proposes CSMR, a cognitive scheduling framework that allows a language model to dynamically decide when to acquire task-relevant visual evidence, significantly improving multimodal reasoning…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

SpatialAct: Probing Spatial Reasoning-to-Action Capabilities of VLM Agents in 3D Scenes

Tianhui Liu, Jie Feng, Zhiheng Zheng, Shengyuan Wang +5 more

The paper introduces SpatialAct, a challenging benchmark that reveals a significant 'reasoning-to-action gap,' showing that current VLMs struggle to maintain coherent spatial understanding and perform…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

StemBind: When MLLMs Get Lost Between Rules and Instances in Abstract Visual Reasoning

Xixiang He, Baiqi Wu, Xingming Li, Ao Cheng +3 more

The paper introduces StemBind, a diagnostic benchmark that separates perception, rule induction, and answer selection in abstract visual reasoning, revealing that the primary failure point for MLLMs i…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 11, 2026

SpatialClaw: Rethinking Action Interface for Agentic Spatial Reasoning

Seokju Cho, Ryo Hachiuma, Abhishek Badki, Hang Su +7 more

This paper proposes SpatialClaw, a training-free framework for spatial reasoning that enables open-ended, complex 3D/4D spatial reasoning.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Explaining is Harder Than Predicting Alone: Evaluating Concept-based Explanations of MLLMs as ICL Visual Classifiers

Carmen Quiles-Ramírez, Leticia L. Rodríguez, Nicolás Martorell, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez

The paper systematically evaluates concept-based explainability in MLLMs, finding that forcing models to generate formal explanations degrades predictive accuracy, suggesting that explaining is genuin…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Revealing Algorithmic Deductive Circuits for Logical Reasoning

Phuong Minh Nguyen, Tien Huu Dang, Naoya Inoue

This paper localizes the attention heads within LLMs responsible for specific reasoning steps, finding that specialized heads handle factual retrieval while higher layers manage global information int…

View →
cs.CVcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Attend to Evidence: Evidence-Anchored Spatial Attention Supervision for Multimodal RLVR

Ruina Hu, Chen Wang, Lai Wei, Jionghao Bai +4 more

The paper introduces EASE, a method that enhances multimodal Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) by providing spatial attention supervision anchored to visual evidence, significantly…

View →
cs.CVRecentJun 1, 2026

Active Exploring like a Pigeon: Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning via Agentic Vision-Language Models

Wei Deng, Xianlin Zhang, Mengshi Qi

The paper proposes an agentic pipeline for spatial reasoning by introducing a dynamic cognitive map and Spatial Assertion Codes (SAC), achieving state-of-the-art performance on complex spatial tasks.

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

ROVER: Routing Object-Centric Visual Evidence for Grounded Multi-Image Reasoning

Guannan Lv, Ren Nie, Hongjian Dou, Tingting Gao

ROVER is a lightweight, learnable plugin that efficiently routes and integrates object-centric visual evidence across multiple images and objects, significantly improving performance on grounded multi…

View →
cs.CLcs.RORecentMay 29, 2026

Multi-Turn Multi-Agent Dialogue for Collaborative Reconstruction Improves VLM Performance on Spatial Reasoning, But Only Barely

Chalamalasetti Kranti, Sherzod Hakimov, David Schlangen

The paper evaluates the performance of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in a collaborative dialogue task requiring spatial reconstruction, finding that while detailed text representations improve results…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Token Predictors Are Not Planners: Building Physically Grounded Causal Reasoners

Zheng Lu, Mingqi Gao, Qinlei Xie, Wanqi Zhong +7 more

The paper argues that current embodied planning benchmarks prioritize superficial language prediction over true physical reasoning, introducing new benchmarks and a large-scale dataset to demonstrate…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Distilling Neuro-Symbolic Programs into 3D Multi-modal LLMs

Wentao Mo, Yang Liu

The paper introduces APEIRIA, a neuro-symbolic 3D Multi-modal LLM that bridges the gap between interpretable symbolic reasoning and flexible, open-vocabulary 3D understanding.

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Mitigating Perceptual Judgment Bias in Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge via Perceptual Perturbation and Reward Modeling

Seojeong Park, Jiho Choi, Junyong Kang, Seonho Lee +2 more

The paper addresses Perceptual Judgment Bias in multimodal LLM judges by introducing a new dataset and a unified training framework that forces models to prioritize visual evidence over plausible text…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Reasoning Matters: Mitigate Hallucination in Multimodal Large Reasoning Models via Reasoning-Conditioned Preference Optimization

Jiawei Kong, Hao Fang, Shunxiang Liao, Jinyu Li +4 more

The paper proposes Reasoning-Conditioned Direct Preference Optimization (RC-DPO) to effectively mitigate hallucinations in multimodal large reasoning models by explicitly conditioning the preference o…

View →
cs.CVcs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Decomposed On-Policy Distillation for Vision-Language Reasoning: Steering Gradients for Visual Grounding

Hee Suk Yoon, Eunseop Yoon, Jaehyun Jang, SooHwan Eom +5 more

The paper proposes Visual Gradient Steering (VGS), a method that decomposes the distillation loss into language and visual components and steers the optimization to prioritize visual grounding, signif…

View →