ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.01583v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentApr 16, 2026

Emulation-based System-on-Chip Security Verification: Challenges and Opportunities

Tanvir Rahman, Shuvagata Saha, Ahmed Y. Alhurubi, Sujan Kumar Saha +2 more

This paper surveys the use of hardware emulation for security verification in System-on-Chip (SoC) design, positioning emulation as a critical, high-fidelity pre-silicon assurance technology.

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

LLMs for Secure Hardware Design and Related Problems: Opportunities and Challenges

Johann Knechtel, Ozgur Sinanoglu, Ramesh Karri

This review analyzes the dual impact of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into hardware design, detailing both their transformative potential in EDA and the critical security vulnerabilities th…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 2, 2026

AI-Assisted Hardware Security Verification: A Survey and AI Accelerator Case Study

Khan Thamid Hasan, Md Ajoad Hasan, Nashmin Alam, Md. Touhidul Islam +2 more

This survey reviews the integration of AI and LLMs into hardware security verification, demonstrating its potential to automate complex stages while stressing the necessity of grounding AI outputs in…

View →
cs.ARcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 15, 2026

VeriCWEty: Embedding enabled Line-Level CWE Detection in Verilog

Prithwish Basu Roy, Zeng Wang, Anatolii Chuvashlov, Weihua Xiao +3 more

VeriCWEty proposes an embedding-based framework to detect and classify common software vulnerabilities (CWEs) in Verilog RTL code at both module and line levels, achieving high detection accuracy.

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LORecentApr 25, 2026

From Language to Logic: Bridging LLMs & Formal Representations for RTL Assertion Generation

Nowfel Mashnoor, Hadi Kamali, Kimia Azar

The paper introduces ProofLoop, a novel ReAct agent that uses a solver-in-the-loop approach to automatically generate and formally verify SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA) from natural language specifica…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 14, 2026

COBALT-TLA: A Neuro-Symbolic Verification Loop for Cross-Chain Bridge Vulnerability Discovery

Dominik Blain

COBALT-TLA introduces a neuro-symbolic verification loop that successfully and autonomously discovers novel cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities by integrating an LLM with the TLA+ model checker.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 14, 2026

Can Agents Secure Hardware? Evaluating Agentic LLM-Driven Obfuscation for IP Protection

Sujan Ghimire, Parsa Mirfasihi, Muhtasim Alam Chowdhury, Veeramani Pugazhenthi +5 more

This paper introduces an agentic LLM-driven framework that automates the generation of functionally correct and security-relevant hardware netlist obfuscation for protecting intellectual property.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

VulnScout-C: A Lightweight Transformer for C Code Vulnerability Detection

Aymen Lassoued, Nacef Mbarek, Bechir Dardouri, Bassem Ouni +2 more

The paper introduces VULNSCOUT-C, a compact, specialized transformer model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in C code vulnerability detection while maintaining low inference cost, making it…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

SoK: From Silicon to Netlist and Beyond $-$ Two Decades of Hardware Reverse Engineering Research

Zehra Karadağ, Simon Klix, René Walendy, Felix Hahn +4 more

This paper systematizes two decades of hardware reverse engineering research by analyzing 187 publications, identifying key technical methods and recommending improvements for reproducibility, standar…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

HarmChip: Evaluating Hardware Security Centric LLM Safety via Jailbreak Benchmarking

Zeng Wang, Minghao Shao, Weimin Fu, Prithwish Basu Roy +5 more

The paper introduces HarmChip, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLM vulnerability to domain-specific hardware security threats, revealing that current safety guardrails fail against semantically disguise…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

AutoSOUP: Safety-Oriented Unit Proof Generation for Component-level Memory-Safety Verification

Paschal C. Amusuo, Ricardo Calvo, Dharun Anandayuvaraj, Taylor Le Lievre +4 more

AutoSOUP is a system that automates component-level memory-safety verification by generating Safety-Oriented Unit Proofs, leveraging a hybrid LLM-based architecture to overcome manual workflow limitat…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Bridging Theory and Practice: An Executable Taxonomy of Security Properties for ProVerif and Tamarin

Leonard Tudorache, Ivan Kurtev, Mark van den Brand

The paper introduces a systematic, executable taxonomy of security properties to bridge the gap between theoretical security definitions and their practical implementation in formal verification tools…

View →
cs.ARRecentMay 27, 2026

FT-Pilot: Automated Fault-Tolerant RTL Rewriting via Vulnerability-Guided LLMs

Weixing Liu, Zizhen Liu, Jing Ye, Naixing Wang +3 more

FT-Pilot is a novel GNN-guided LLM framework that automatically rewrites RTL code to harden digital circuits against soft errors, providing an efficient, automated path for reliability optimization.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation

Xiaolei Ren

The paper introduces False Security Confidence (FSC), a new metric to measure the inherent prevalence of security vulnerabilities in code generated by LLMs that are otherwise functionally correct, eve…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery

Abhinav Agarwal

The paper introduces Refute-or-Promote, an adversarial multi-agent review system that significantly improves the precision of LLM-assisted defect discovery by filtering out false positives.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

uGen: An Agentic Framework for Generating Microarchitectural Attack PoCs

Debopriya Roy Dipta, Thore Tiemann, Eduard Marin, Thomas Eisenbarth +1 more

The paper introduces uGen, the first LLM-driven framework that uses a retrieval-augmented, multi-agent design to automatically generate functionally correct microarchitectural attack Proof-of-Concepts…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

On Securing the Software Development Lifecycle in IoT RISC-V Trusted Execution Environments

Annika Wilde, Samira Briongos, Claudio Soriente, Ghassan Karame

The paper introduces a novel toolkit to enhance RISC-V Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) by adding modular extensions for secure enclave update, migration, state continuity, and trusted time, ther…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Finding Missing Input Validation in TEEs via LLM-Assisted Symbolic Execution

Chengyan Ma, Jieke Shi, Ruidong Han, Ye Liu +2 more

The paper introduces SymTEE, an LLM-assisted symbolic execution framework that detects missing input validation vulnerabilities in TEE applications without needing complex, real TEE setups.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →